Clinical and Cultural Assessment: The Commodification of Care - CX-DOS-W-001

EXPERT DOSSIER

Court of Taste

1/7/2026

clear glass mug with brown liquid on white table
clear glass mug with brown liquid on white table

Executive Overview

Experts across health, psychology, and cultural analysis identify a critical misalignment in the wellness sector: care has been transformed into a market-driven obligation that undermines its original purpose.

Key Professional Findings

1. Wellness Has Shifted from Outcome to Identity

Professionals note that wellness is increasingly treated as a personal brand rather than a health outcome. Individuals are encouraged to identify as wellness-oriented, regardless of actual well-being.

This conflation creates performative adherence without meaningful benefit.

2. Over-Prescription of Self-Regulation

Experts warn against the excessive emphasis on self-regulation tools—tracking, journaling, routines—without addressing external stressors. This places disproportionate responsibility on individuals already under strain.

Care becomes exhausting.

3. Emotional Labor Is Being Medicalized

Normal emotional responses to modern conditions—fatigue, anxiety, overwhelm—are increasingly framed as dysfunctions requiring correction.

Experts caution that this pathologizes lived experience instead of contextualizing it.

4. Wellness Products Are Replacing Professional Care

A significant concern is the substitution of products and rituals for professional intervention. Supplements, apps, and routines are marketed as solutions without adequate oversight.

This creates false confidence and delays proper care.

5. Trust Erosion

When wellness promises exceed results, trust deteriorates. Experts report rising skepticism toward wellness brands that emphasize aesthetics over accountability.

The credibility gap is widening.

Risk Analysis

Unchecked, the wellness sector risks becoming emotionally extractive—offering reassurance while demanding constant engagement.

Professional Recommendation

Experts advocate for a return to:

  • Episodic care rather than continuous optimization

  • Structural acknowledgment of stressors

  • Wellness that responds rather than commands

Care should feel like relief—not surveillance.